Skip to main content
ETFLens

Which ASX ETFs hold International Bank for Reconstruction & Development · #1 (IBRD)?

As at Q2 2026, IBRD is among the most widely held stocks across ASX-listed ETFs, appearing in approximately 10 ETFs. Its largest single position is approximately 1.47% in AGVT (Betashares Australian Government Bond ETF). General information only, not financial advice.

General information only, not financial advice. ETFLens does not hold an AFSL. Always read the relevant PDS and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.

All weights are approximate, drawn from each fund's published holdings as at Q2 2026, and change as funds rebalance.

ETFFundCategoryWeight
AGVTBetashares Australian Government Bond ETFBondsapprox. 1.47%
OZBDBetashares Australian Composite Bond ETFBondsapprox. 1.15%
AEBDBetashares Ethical Australian Bond ETFBondsapprox. 1.10%
IAFiShares Core Composite Bond ETFBondsapprox. 0.17%
GBNDBetashares Global Green Bond Currency Hedged ETFBondsapprox. 0.17%
VAFVanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETFBondsapprox. 0.14%
BNDSBetaShares Western Asset Aus Bond Active ETFBondsapprox. 0.12%
VCFVanguard International Credit Securities Index (Hedged) ETFBondsapprox. 0.06%
VEFIVanguard Ethically Conscious Global Aggregate Bond Index (Hedged) ETFBondsapprox. 0.06%
VBNDVanguard Global Aggregate Bond Index (Hedged) ETFBondsapprox. 0.03%

Want to see what any of these funds overlap with? Try the free ETF overlap checker, or browse the most widely held stocks.

Hold more than one of these? See your combined IBRD exposure across all your ETFs with the Stock X-Ray.

IBRD in ETFs: frequently asked questions

Which ASX ETFs hold IBRD?

International Bank for Reconstruction & Development · #1 (IBRD) is held by approximately 10 ASX-listed ETFs, including AGVT, OZBD, AEBD, IAF, GBND. General information only.

Which ETF has the largest IBRD weighting?

AGVT (Betashares Australian Government Bond ETF) has the largest IBRD position at approximately 1.47% of the fund, as at Q2 2026. Past weightings are not a reliable indicator of future weightings.